--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de Lucidchart? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de Lucidchart gracias a Capterra Ecuador. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Lucidchart - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra Ecuador 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Software de diagrama](/directory/30941/diagram/software) > [Lucidchart](/software/146136/lucidchart) # Lucidchart Canonical: https://www.capterra.ec/software/146136/lucidchart Página: 1 de 91\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.ec/software/146136/lucidchart?page=2) > Esta aplicación de diagramación en línea facilita la creación y el intercambio de diagramas profesionales. > > Veredicto: 2249 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.5/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa Lucidchart? Lucidchart hace posible que cualquiera pueda visualizar fácilmente una idea, proceso o sistema complejo. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.5/5** | 2249 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.4/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.3/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.4/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 4.4/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: Lucid Software - **Ubicación**: South Jordan, EE. UU. - **Constitución**: 2010 ## Contexto comercial - **Precio inicial**: $9,00 - **Modelo de precios**: (versión gratuita disponible) (Prueba gratis) - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop), Chromebook (desktop), Android (móvil), iPhone (móvil), iPad (móvil) - **Idiomas admitidos**: alemán, coreano, español, francés, inglés, italiano, japonés, neerlandés, polaco, portugués, ruso, sueco - **Países disponibles**: Albania, Alemania, Antigua y Barbuda, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Azerbaiyán, Bahamas, Bangladés, Barbados, Belice, Bielorrusia, Bolivia, Bosnia y Herzegovina, Brasil, Bulgaria, Bután, Bélgica, Camboya, Canadá y 78 más ## Funciones - Arrastrar y soltar - Automatización de procesos empresariales - Biblioteca de componentes - Búsqueda/filtro - Comentarios/notas - Configuración de flujos de trabajo - Control de versiones - Controles o permisos de acceso - Creación de diagramas - Creación de mockups - Creación de organigramas - Creación de prototipos IU - Creación de wireframes - Diseño y modelado del proceso - Editor gráfico del flujo de trabajo - Editor para arrastrar y soltar - Fotos de empleados - Gestión de documentos - Gestión de flujos de trabajo - Gestión del diseño - Herramientas de colaboración - Importación y exportación de datos - Interfaz de escritorio - Interfaz móvil - Lluvia de ideas - Mapas mentales - Modelos - Modelos de diseño - Modelos personalizables - Organigrama de programación - Publishing/Sharing - Third-Party Integrations - Vinculación de datos - Vista de Gantt/cronología ## Integraciones (en total: 54) - Amazon EC2 - Asana - AuditBoard - BambooHR - Box - Confluence - Craft.io - Dropbox Business - Dropbox Paper - Figma - GitHub - Gliffy - Google Calendar - Google Classroom - Google Cloud … y 39 integraciones más ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Asistencia telefónica - Chat ## Categoría - [Software de diagrama](https://www.capterra.ec/directory/30941/diagram/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Software de diagrama](https://www.capterra.ec/directory/30941/diagram/software) - [Software para Wireframe](https://www.capterra.ec/directory/30850/wireframe/software) - [Programas para diagramas de flujo](https://www.capterra.ec/directory/31060/flowchart/software) - [Programas para hacer organigramas](https://www.capterra.ec/directory/31397/org-chart/software) - [Software de gestión de proyectos sin fines de lucro](https://www.capterra.ec/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Visio](https://www.capterra.ec/software/201133/visio) — 4.5/5 (3280 reviews) 2. [Miro](https://www.capterra.ec/software/128955/miro) — 4.7/5 (1683 reviews) 3. [Aha\!](https://www.capterra.ec/software/144020/aha) — 4.7/5 (561 reviews) 4. [Figma](https://www.capterra.ec/software/175027/figma) — 4.7/5 (861 reviews) 5. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.ec/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (5738 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Excelente herramienta de trabajo" — 5.0/5 > **Omar** | *24 de octubre de 2024* | Almacenamiento | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: La facilidad con la que puedes desarrollar diagramas y mapeos de procesos > > **Puntos en contra**: Me gustaría que fuera posible descargar los documentos en mas formatos > > En general bastante buena, me a facilitado bastante el trabajo con mis colaboradores ----- ### "La mejor herramienta para diagramas de flujo" — 5.0/5 > **Elizabeth** | *28 de diciembre de 2024* | Servicios de información | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Me gusta por que es una gran herramienta para realizar diagramas de flujo en la web sin necesidad de instalación. > > **Puntos en contra**: Puede estar limitado en plantillas para empezar un diagrama. > > La herramienta en general es buena, para una pequeña empresa y diagramar procesos básicos. ----- ### "Ahorra mucho tiempo" — 4.0/5 > **Usuario verificado** | *22 de septiembre de 2024* | Entretenimiento | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Es muy intuitiva y fácil de usar. Al ser una interfaz de arrastrar y poner donde uno quiere, los gráficos se hacen muy rápido. Realmente recomendable > > **Puntos en contra**: Tal vez las limitaciones de cuentas free, pero comparado con la competencia no esta tan mal, me gusto mucho, es la única "desventaja" que le encuentro > > Tenia que resolver muy rápidamente un diagrama de flujo y me cruce con esta app, realmente me salvo ese día, cada vez que quiero hacer ese tipo de tareas la uso. ----- ### "Organigramas + Drag & Drop. Potencia sin igual\!" — 4.0/5 > **Miguel** | *9 de abril de 2026* | Desarrollo de programas | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Lucid Chart sigue siendo uno de los mejores creadores de organigramas de la web. Permitiendo de una manera muy fácil y rápida crear organigramas en minutos, sin importar su complejidad. > > **Puntos en contra**: es poco probable que no guste algo de un gestor de notas tan sencillo pero potente. sin nunguna queja por estos lugares\! > > Uso lucidchart para crear procesos y brainstorming, como hay que solamente arrastrar y soltar, es muy fácil y se torna usable a diario . asi que sin que uno se de cuenta se instala con el soft cotidiano y no se va nunca mas. ----- ### "Lucidchart Functionality and Drawbacks Explored Through Real-World Academic Use." — 4.0/5 > **Abdennour** | *7 de abril de 2026* | Educación superior | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: I- ) What it does well (the good): 1- For standard workflows, Lucidchart nails the fundamentals. the UI is clean ,intuitive and user friendly . The massive pre-built templates is a lifesaver (you dont have to build data pipelines or state machines from absolute scratch . where the platform shines is in it realtime collaboration . working with a group on a shared canvas during project sprints feels completely seamless , it handles multiple cursors , live edits and comment threads ,making it highly reliable daily driver for group work. 2- i love lucid AI ,honestly first time i underestimated its capabilites ,but when i got used to it ,i found it so usefull , especially when it generate diagrames from text , edit those diagrame and tweak them as you prompt ,even explaining what is going on in the diagram and describing it . and one thing took my attention, the feature where you select the objects meant to be affected ,without affecting other objects. (although recording voice sometimes crush,but i trust that it can be corrected easily ) so consider promote lucid ai capabilities and potential a little so that it become known and easy to get familiar with for users. 3- conditional formating with ai : using natural language to say for ex: "highlight all nodes with a latency over 50 ms in red " works efficiently and save you a lot of time by automating dull tasks that takes time especially in huge projects. 4- another caluable capability available, is the ability to import diagram files from other widely used tools , including Visio(.vsdx) and DRaw.io formats for Ex : you can open ,rewiew and make basic edits to diagrams created by other software, this interoperability is helpful in colaborative environement where files may originate from diffrent diagramming platforms. > > **Puntos en contra**: II- ) Performance and reliability, and what it doesn't do well (the bad): 1- one of the my "negative" observations in this platform is that it is a bit resource consuming.Sometimes when I work on one small-sized project and check out the task manager ,the browser tab of this lucidchart project is consuming about 1 GB of RAM .i wonder what will happen if the case of a multiple medium-sized projects and big-sized projects with a lucid's realtime communication layer ,i think it will be hard for a normal laptop in this case without stuttering. it is frustrating to have the software become the bottleneck of your thought process ... i know that 16 GB laptops are common amongs CS student and tutors but keep in mind that the user's RAM is used for many other apps and tabs in the browser like a voice chat or video chat meetings and obviously not just the browser , VS code and other programming tools as well... .i wonder how bigger the resource consumption for this chart platform if lucid dev team consider adding additional AI features like FULL diagram generation , or FULL realtime AI collaboration that will have a significant impact on resources, including RAM .so consider optimizing webGL rendering. 2- AI spacial hallucination : when you prompt the ai to generate a complex , multi-layered architecture (like a microservice backend with specific VPC boundaries ...), the ai completely at spacial logic .it will hallucinate parent-child node relationships , put databases outside of security containers , or overlap text boxes. 3- i tried many times to prompt lucid AI to change the layout shapes of all nodes in the diagram , and as always ,the ai reply : " I can't directly swap/replace your existing nodes into diffrent "device" layout shapes with the tools available to me right now .Fastest way to do it manually:" . although , the ai did it before when creating diagrams from scratch , but when trying to update the diagram ,complete Failure , so if i dont use ai for automating simple dull things that takes time , when am i supposed to need it? and it tells me to do it manually... 4- one potential improvement would be the availability of more accessible user support for free-tier users . currently most assistance is provided through documentation and help articles , while more responsive support appears primarly available for paid plans, expanding structured support channels for free users could improve accessibility and user experience , and gives you important feedbacks that might helps you improve the platform ,especially for students , researchers and early adopters exploring the platform. 5- i call it "the spaghetti threshold" : once you hit a certain level of complexity , the "auto-routing" for lines becomes a bottleneck ,if you change your mind about a core component and move it , the software tries to re-route 50 lines at once .if you havent re-planned the layout , you spend more time fixing " line spaghetti" than thinking about the engineering. > > As a final-year computer science engineering student specializing in IoT and AI ,i spend my years in this career mapping out IoT system architecture ,neural networks topologies and complex logic flows before i write a single line of code. so i primarily use Lucidchart to organize research ideas , design systems using diagramming tools, as well as collaborate on academic projects with my professors and my colleagues, making it easier to discuss them. One of the strongest aspects of the platform is real-time collaboration. Working with classmates or discussing ideas with professors on a shared canvas feels smooth and reliable, with live edits and comments that make group work much easier. Features like Lucid AI and conditional formatting can also speed up some tasks, especially when generating diagrams from text or highlighting certain elements automatically. At the same time, the experience is not perfect. The browser version can be resource intensive when projects grow in size, and sometimes the AI struggles with complex architectures or spatial organization in diagrams. Certain repetitive edits still require manual work, which reduces some of the expected automation benefits. Overall, Lucidchart is a solid and professional diagramming platform that works well for organizing technical ideas, documenting systems, and collaborating with others. Despite a few limitations, it remains a practical tool for turning complex concepts into clear visual structures. Comparison between LucidChart and the Alternative diagramming and visual collaboration platforms that i ve tried: 1- Miro is a whiteboard , it has no "logic" .if you want to make a UML diagram in Miro , you have to mannually draw every box and hope they align, it is not for proffessional engineering hands-off because it is too loose. lucidChart has the "industry standard" technical shapes . it has a grid , snapping ,layers.. although to be technically pricise ,lucidchart is better for production in theory , but it can be a failure in practice once the project reaches a certain complexity . The verdict: even with its flaws , lucidchart is still more professional for final document than a whiteboard tool. it is the least bad option for visual documentation. 2- Draw.io is a functional utility , while lucidchart is a premium SaaS Platform , it is for users who need a lightweight ,cost free tool that works offline ,it allows XML manipulation excelent for users who wants to store diagrams in a local directoy. The Trade-off: DRaw.io's UI is significantly more dated, and its real-time collaboration is less seamless than lucidchart's "multiplayer" cursor experience. 3- Eraser.io is built specifically for engineering workflows where lucidchart is more of a generalpurpose collaborative visual Editor. with eraser you can write code to generate diagrams while still having a visual canvas to tweak them .it bridges the gap between manual drawing and automated generation .in the other hand, lucidchart has much broader library of non-technical shapes (like org charts, business processes) that eraser lacks 4- Mermaid.js is a diagram-as-code while lucidchart is a GUI . mermaid is the imdustry standard for documentation that lives inside GitHub repository, because diagrams are writtend in simple markdowm-like text , they can be version-controlled and updated via script. the trade-off: mermaid recuires a learning curve for syntax and offers zero manual "drag and drop" control . that will be a serious inconvenience for a mixed roles Team where only the engineeres can update the charts leading to outdated charts. if the automated layout engine places a node in a confusing spot , you cannot simply click and move it like you do it easily in lucidchart. ----- Página: 1 de 91\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.ec/software/146136/lucidchart?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.ec/software/146136/lucidchart) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Datos estructurados