--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de GitLab? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de GitLab gracias a Capterra Ecuador. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: GitLab - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra Ecuador 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Software para desarrollo de apps](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [GitLab](/software/159806/gitlab) # GitLab Canonical: https://www.capterra.ec/software/159806/gitlab Página: 1 de 50\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.ec/software/159806/gitlab?page=2) > Mantén un registro del progreso y la actividad en tus proyectos. Codifica, prueba e implementa. > > Veredicto: 1221 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.6/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa GitLab? Plataforma de DevOps basada en la nube que ayuda a empresas de todos los tamaños a mejorar las operaciones comerciales a través de seguimiento temporal, gestión de incidentes, revisión de código, cumplimiento normativo y más. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.6/5** | 1221 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.4/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.2/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.5/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 4.6/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: GitLab - **Constitución**: 2011 ## Contexto comercial - **Precio inicial**: $29,00 - **Modelo de precios**: (versión gratuita disponible) (Prueba gratis) - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Windows (local), Linux (local) - **Idiomas admitidos**: alemán, chino, francés, inglés, japonés - **Países disponibles**: Afganistán, Albania, Alemania, Andorra, Angola, Anguila, Antigua y Barbuda, Arabia Saudita, Argelia, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaiyán, Bahamas, Bangladés, Barbados, Baréin, Belice y 205 más ## Funciones - API - Alertas y notificaciones - Análisis de vulnerabilidades - Arrastrar y soltar - Automated Testing - Control de procesos de aprobación - Control de versiones - Controles o permisos de acceso - Creación de informes para TI - Depuración - Entorno de desarrollo integrado - Entrega continua - Flujo de trabajo de aprobación - Garantía de calidad - Gestión de carteras - Gestión de configuración - Gestión de flujos de trabajo - Gestión de la conformidad - Gestión de problemas - Gestión de recursos - Gestión de repositorios - Gestión de tareas - Gestión de tests - Gestión de versiones - Gestión del cambio - Herramientas de colaboración - Implementación continua - Integración continua - Integración de repositorio de código - Interfaz gráfica de usuario - Modelos personalizables - Planificación de proyectos - Priorización - Real-Time Analytics - Revisión de código - Seguimiento de creación de informes y proyectos - Seguimiento de errores - Seguimiento de hitos - Seguimiento del proyecto - Seguridad de aplicaciones - Supervisión ## Integraciones (en total: 39) - Akismet - Anchore - Asana - Assembla - Bamboo - Beyond Identity - Bitbucket - Bridgecrew - Bugzilla - Buildkite - Campfire Blaze - Checkmarx One - Datadog - Deepfactor - Discord … y 24 integraciones más ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Asistencia 24/7 - Chat ## Categoría - [Software para desarrollo de apps](https://www.capterra.ec/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Software para desarrollo de apps](https://www.capterra.ec/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [Software de gestión de proyectos sin fines de lucro](https://www.capterra.ec/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) - [Herramientas de integración continua](https://www.capterra.ec/directory/31119/continuous-integration/software) - [Herramientas DevOps](https://www.capterra.ec/directory/31120/devops/software) - [Software para la gestión de proyectos Agile](https://www.capterra.ec/directory/31556/agile-project-management-tools/software) ## Alternativas 1. [GitHub](https://www.capterra.ec/software/129067/github) — 4.8/5 (6178 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.ec/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15381 reviews) 3. [Microsoft Visual Studio](https://www.capterra.ec/software/101288/microsoft-visual-studio) — 4.6/5 (3006 reviews) 4. [Airtable](https://www.capterra.ec/software/146652/airtable) — 4.6/5 (2231 reviews) 5. [Bitbucket](https://www.capterra.ec/software/157785/bitbucket) — 4.6/5 (1346 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "A powerful DevOps powerhouse with a dense but complete interface" — 5.0/5 > **Enguerran** | *18 de mayo de 2026* | Artículos deportivos | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: GitLab has this biggest edge, like it really leans into a full, everything-in-one DevOps platform kind of approach. You get source code management, issue tracking, and CI/CD pipelines that are built in, all tied together inside one single interface, and yeah it feels like a huge productivity push. Setting up pipeline stuff through .gitlab-ci.yml is pretty direct, plus the native Container Registry makes it genuinely easy to roll out Docker images, especially during our day to day development sprints. > > **Puntos en contra**: The user interface can feel kind of overwhelming and cluttered, especially when you’re trying to move through those deeply nested settings or while reviewing a complex Merge Request. For non-technical folks, like Product Owners who are tracking issues day to day the initial learning curve is pretty steep. On top of that, the self-hosted instance can get resource-heavy and it tends to need regular maintenance so runner performances stay optimal or at least not degrade to much. > > We use GitLab as our main repository hosting and deployment server, it kinda bridges the gap between engineering and QA workflows. It works well, it links things up without too much friction and honestly it feels solid. Being able to lock down branches, spin up runners to automate code quality checks , and then track deployments automatically, gives us huge security and that calm peace of mind. Overall it is an indispensable, sturdy tool for modern team collaboration and DevOps orchestration, even when things get messy, we still stay on track. ----- ### "The Best All-in-One DevOps Platform, Especially for CI/CD" — 5.0/5 > **Usuario verificado** | *15 de diciembre de 2025* | Administración gubernamental | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: I really appreciate GitLab’s single-application approach—it’s become the backbone of our entire DevOps workflow. The built-in CI/CD pipelines are a game-changer; being able to define the entire build, test, and deployment process in a single .gitlab-ci.yml file right in the repository is so much more efficient than juggling separate tools like Jenkins. We rely heavily on merge requests, and the integrated security scanning (SAST/DAST) is a huge plus—it gives developers immediate feedback during the merge process, which helps us catch issues early and maintain quality without slowing down delivery. > > **Puntos en contra**: From my experience, GitLab can feel quite resource-intensive, especially when we’re running a self-hosted instance or dealing with pipelines that include complex jobs. I’ve noticed performance slowdowns when navigating large project backlogs or loading detailed merge request diffs, which can be frustrating during critical reviews. While the UI is generally intuitive, the sheer breadth of features—issues, boards, CI/CD, security—can make the initial setup and configuration overwhelming for new team members. It takes some time and guidance before they feel comfortable. > > In my experience, GitLab has truly streamlined our journey from idea to deployment. As a DevOps Engineer, I rely heavily on its seamless integration of source control, issue tracking, and CI/CD automation to keep our delivery pipeline moving at a high velocity. While I’ve noticed a slight learning curve and occasional performance hiccups at scale, the depth of features—especially the native GitOps capabilities—has made it my go-to platform for modern software development and deployment. It’s a solution that genuinely supports the way we work. ----- ### "User interface is too old" — 3.0/5 > **Ahliman** | *30 de noviembre de 2024* | Internet | Valoración de la recomendación: 5.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: I started using GitLab because private repositories were free. I've been using it less since private repositories became free on GitHub as well, but it remains a great tool. A large part of its features are sufficient in the free plan. > > **Puntos en contra**: I hate GitLab's interface; it's just my personal opinion, but nothing feels intuitive. They use Cloudflare protection everywhere, the colors, etc., make it look like an old-school Microsoft application. Plus, it’s much less popular than GitHub in terms of open-source projects and community activity. > > GitLab doesn’t have much value for my personal use anymore since I’ve migrated all my projects to GitHub. The only advantage GitLab has is the ability to organize projects into categories (which, unfortunately, isn’t possible on GitHub). Many companies still prefer GitLab for historical reasons, but personally, I prefer GitHub. To me, GitLab and Bitbucket are similar products. ----- ### "Convenient and easy to use" — 5.0/5 > **Song** | *16 de marzo de 2026* | Almacenamiento | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Project management, project builds, and image repositories. These are the tools we use most frequently in our daily development work, and they’re incredibly useful. I also leverage integrations with project management tools to help me complete projects more effectively. > > **Puntos en contra**: So far, I haven’t had any complaints. The company uses the official repository, and I use a locally deployed community repository—both work very well.The Enterprise Edition is more expensive. > > GitLab can support our entire development lifecycle, covering the full process from code management to image management. ----- ### "Suitable for large deployments, and always improving." — 4.0/5 > **Roke** | *29 de septiembre de 2025* | Defensa y espacio | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: It allows users and organisations to organise their repositories into (hierarchical) directories, unlike Forgejo and GitHub. Additionally, like Forgejo, but unlike GitHub, it provides an issue tracker, which is moderated. > > **Puntos en contra**: SAAS GitLab's spam detection is aggressive when modifying Snippets containing significant amounts of content. Additionally, although it provides a useful issue tracker, and public forum for personal issues (and GitHub has recently reduced the level of support that its agents are meant to provide), GitLab offers no private, personal (account) support. > > My interactions with staff at their issue tracker are generally very positive, although they are at times slow to respond, and a little apathetic about finer details. ----- Página: 1 de 50\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.ec/software/159806/gitlab?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.ec/software/159806/gitlab) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Datos estructurados