--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de CAEplex? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de CAEplex gracias a Capterra Ecuador. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: CAEplex - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra Ecuador 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Software de simulación](/directory/30607/simulation/software) > [CAEplex](/software/160392/caeplex) # CAEplex Canonical: https://www.capterra.ec/software/160392/caeplex Página: 1 de 2\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.ec/software/160392/caeplex?page=2) > Plataforma basada en la web, fácil de usar, para realizar análisis de elementos finitos que se ejecutan en la nube. > > Veredicto: 12 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.3/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa CAEplex? PyME industriales que desean comenzar a realizar análisis mecánicos de los productos que fabrican. Diseñadores industriales, impresores 3D y aficionados a pasatiempos que desean analizar cómo se comportan sus diseños. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.3/5** | 12 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.1/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 5.0/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.8/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 3.8/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 80% | (8/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: Seamplex - **Ubicación**: Ciudad de Mexico, México - **Constitución**: 2016 ## Contexto comercial - **Precio inicial**: $25,00 - **Modelo de precios**: (versión gratuita disponible) (Prueba gratis) - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Países disponibles**: Alemania, Australia, Brasil, Canadá, China, Estados Unidos, India, Japón, México ## Funciones - Creación de informes/análisis - Imágenes en 3D - Modelado matemático ## Integraciones (en total: 1) - Onshape ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Asistencia telefónica - Chat ## Categoría - [Software de simulación](https://www.capterra.ec/directory/30607/simulation/software) ## Alternativas 1. [AnyLogic](https://www.capterra.ec/software/95940/anylogic) — 4.5/5 (518 reviews) 2. [MATLAB](https://www.capterra.ec/software/125813/matlab) — 4.6/5 (2090 reviews) 3. [SIMUL8](https://www.capterra.ec/software/114609/simul8-professional) — 4.6/5 (142 reviews) 4. [SimScale](https://www.capterra.ec/software/145960/simscale) — 4.5/5 (140 reviews) 5. [SimSolid](https://www.capterra.ec/software/160500/simsolid) — 4.4/5 (34 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "CAEplex 1 year survey" — 5.0/5 > **Pawel** | *10 de agosto de 2021* | Hospital y atención sanitaria | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: I liked easy acces to modeling of thermal and mechanical analisys > > **Puntos en contra**: Lack of report generation. You need to do it by yourself ----- ### "eye-opening, modern technology" — 4.0/5 > **Andreas** | *1 de agosto de 2017* > > **Puntos a favor**: I head the opportunity to test a beta version of CAEplex with an eye towards its use of webGL-based x3d technology. I was really impressed by its innovative synthesis of an easy to use, no installation required, web interface with a powerful FEM analyzer and solver on high performance servers. It was eye-opening how quickly it was possible to set up the provided example problem and arrive at a full simulation. Very polished. > > **Puntos en contra**: Sorry, my experience did not go into enough detail to explore the limitations of CAEplex although I am sure there are a few. Other than elastic rheologies, crack propagation are outside the scope currently but could be targets. ----- ### "I´ve been using the free trial option and it´s really easy to get fast results on your models." — 3.0/5 > **Ayrton** | *25 de julio de 2017* | Ingeniería industrial o mecánica | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: This software have two main features that make it great. First at all, is that you don´t need to have a sophisticated hardware, because CAEplex runs into the cloud, and second is that it´s really easy to use, because the intefaz is great for people how isn´t related with softwares about simulations. > > **Puntos en contra**: Maybe, it would be good to have documentation in other lenguages, such as spanish or portuguese, in order to reduce the barrier of entrance at the world of simulation in countries from South America. > > Get a fast resolution and first idea on how some model is going to behave under specific conditions. ----- ### "A Great Option for FEA" — 5.0/5 > **Usuario verificado** | *14 de enero de 2020* | Ingeniería industrial o mecánica | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: It’s really affordable and offers easy integration with Onshape, plus it’s super quick and doesn’t slow me down. > > **Puntos en contra**: I wish there were more color options for gradients. > > As a designer I am out at ease by knowing I can rely on FEA from CAEplex ----- ### "Useful tool to explore, I love the cloud-based implementation" — 4.0/5 > **Xavier** | *20 de enero de 2020* | Ingeniería industrial o mecánica | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Cloud-based. It is always annoying to be tight to a coputer where you have your software license. Floating licenses are usually more expensive and still require for the installation of the software. The cloud-based approach is just perfect to present results to costumers or during meetings. The user interface is beatiful and easy to use. > > **Puntos en contra**: I did not spend enough time testing it but I would definitely consider it in the future for thermo-mechanical modelling. > > We re-posted one of your articles (with permission) fot its use in our blog Tribonet.org. It has been quite succesful, 1200 views already. https://www.tribonet.org/say-modeling-not-simulation/ ----- Página: 1 de 2\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.ec/software/160392/caeplex?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.ec/software/160392/caeplex) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Datos estructurados